Deep Directed Generative Autoencoders

0
Structured data

A study conducted in the UK from 2009 to 2010 by leading scientists explored neonatal resuscitation practices in various neonatal units, aiming to assess adherence to international guidelines and identify differences between tertiary and non-tertiary care providers...

Read on arXivCardiologyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

One Sentence Abstract

This study proposes a deep neural network-based autoencoder with a deterministic encoder and probabilistic decoder to learn a simplified distribution of discrete data, using the straight-through estimator for gradient calculations and achieving better results through pre-training and stacking multiple network levels.

Simplified Abstract

A research team has developed a new approach to studying how countries collaborate in scientific projects. They've created a method that's like a tool to help us see which countries work closely together in science. This tool works by breaking down the data and rearranging it in a way that makes it simpler to understand, much like flattening a piece of paper to make it easier to read.

To use this tool, they've employed a special type of math called a "deep neural network" that can learn from the data and make predictions. They train this network to maximize the accuracy of its predictions, helping it get better at understanding the data over time.

One key aspect of this method is that it helps the researchers avoid getting lost in too many details, focusing only on the most important aspects. This is similar to using an autoencoder, a machine learning tool that helps make sense of complex data by compressing it into simpler form.

The researchers also faced some challenges in their work. One was finding a way to calculate the gradients, which are like the steps a machine takes to improve its understanding. They solved this problem by using a technique called the "straight-through estimator."

Another challenge was that to optimize the results, they needed to stack multiple levels of this method together, somewhat like building a tower of blocks. This approach helped them get much better results than if they had only used a single level.

The importance of this research lies in its ability to help us understand how countries collaborate in science. By using this new method, they were able to gain insights into which countries work closely together, and how this collaboration changes over time. This can help us better understand the dynamics of international scientific collaborations and potentially improve them, leading to more effective research and innovation.

Study Fields

Main fields:

  • Deep Learning
  • Autoencoders
  • Regularization

Subfields:

  • Neural Networks
  • Encoders
  • Decoders
  • Sparse Autoencoders
  • Log-likelihood Reconstruction Error
  • Regularization Techniques
  • Ancestral Sampling
  • Gradient Descent
  • Pre-training
  • Stacking Models

Study Objectives

  • To develop a method that utilizes an autoencoder-like structure with a deterministic discrete function and a probabilistic decoder to learn an encoder function f(⋅) that maps X to f(X) with a simpler distribution than X itself.
  • To use the log-likelihood reconstruction error as a measure of the goodness of the learned encoder.
  • To employ a regularizer on the encoded activations h = f(x) to simplify the distribution of the encoded data.
  • To train a deep neural network as both the encoder and decoder to maximize the average of the optimal log-likelihood log⁡p(x).
  • To explore the potential benefits of pre-training and stacking such an architecture to capture data distributions that are more easily captured by a simple parametric model.
  • To demonstrate the feasibility of generating samples from the model using ancestral sampling.
  • To address the challenge of using regular back-propagation to obtain the gradient on the parameters of the encoder by employing the straight-through estimator as a solution.

Conclusions

  1. The likelihood of discrete data can be rewritten as a combination of a parametrized conditional probability and a regularizer on the encoded activations, resembling the log-likelihood reconstruction error of an autoencoder.
  2. Deep neural networks can represent both the encoder and decoder, with the goal of maximizing the average of the optimal log-likelihood.
  3. The objective is to learn an encoder that maps input data to a simpler distribution, estimated by the parameter P(H), which "flattens the manifold" or concentrates probability mass in fewer relevant dimensions.
  4. Generating samples from the model is straightforward using ancestral sampling.
  5. A challenge is that regular back-propagation cannot be used for the encoder's gradient, but the straight-through estimator can be used as an effective alternative.
  6. Better results can be obtained by pre-training and stacking the architecture, gradually transforming the data distribution into one that is more easily captured by a simple parametric model.

References

Y. Bengio
Bengio, Y. (2009). Learning deep architectures for AI. Learning deep architectures for AINow Publishers.
G.E. HintonArtificial Intelligence
Hinton, G. E. (1989). Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185–234. Artificial Intelligence40
Y. Bengio
Bengio, Y. (2014). How auto-encoders could provide credit assignment in deep networks via target propagation. Technical report, arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.7906.
Author(s) unknown
et al. Bengio, Y., Mesnil, G., Dauphin, Y., and Rifai, S. (2013a). Better mixing via deep representations. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’13). ACM. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’13)
Y. Bengio
Bengio, Y. (2013). Estimating or propagating gradients through stochastic neurons. Technical Report arXiv:1305.2982, Universite de Montreal.
Author(s) unknown
et al. Bengio, Y., Léonard, N., and Courville, A. (2013b). Estimating or propagating gradients through stochastic neurons for conditional computation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.3432. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.3432
G. Hinton
Hinton, G. (2012). Neural networks for machine learning. Coursera, video lectures.
J. Martens
Martens, J. (2010). Deep learning via Hessian-free optimization. In L. Bottou and M. Littman, editors, Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10), pages 735–742. ACM. Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10)
Author(s) unknownNeural Computation
et al. Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., and Teh, Y.-W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18, 1527–1554. Neural Computation18
Author(s) unknown
et al. Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., and Larochelle, H. (2007). Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In NIPS’2006. NIPS’2006
G.E. Hinton, R. SalakhutdinovScience
Hinton, G. E. and Salakhutdinov, R. (2006). Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks. Science, 313, 504–507. Science313
D.P. Kingma, M. Welling
Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M. (2014). Auto-encoding variational bayes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)
Author(s) unknown
et al. Gregor, K., Danihelka, I., Mnih, A., Blundell, C., and Wierstra, D. (2014). Deep autoregressive networks. In ICML’2014. ICML’2014
A. Mnih, K. Gregor
Mnih, A. and Gregor, K. (2014). Neural variational inference and learning in belief networks. In ICML’2014. ICML’2014
Author(s) unknown
et al. Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., and Wierstra, D. (2014). Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. Technical report, arXiv:1401.4082.
J. Bornschein, Y. Bengio
Bornschein, J. and Bengio, Y. (2014). Reweighted wake-sleep. Technical report, arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2751.
B.U I. Murray, H. Larochelle
Murray, B. U. I. and Larochelle, H. (2014). A deep and tractable density estimator. In ICML’2014. ICML’2014
Author(s) unknown
et al. Bergstra, J., Breuleux, O., Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Desjardins, G., Turian, J., Warde-Farley, D., and Bengio, Y. (2010). Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy). Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy)Oral Presentation.
Author(s) unknown
et al. Bastien, F., Lamblin, P., Pascanu, R., Bergstra, J., Goodfellow, I. J., Bergeron, A., Bouchard, N., and Bengio, Y. (2012). Theano: new features and speed improvements. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS 2012 Workshop.

References

Unlock full article access by joining Solve